Is Abortion a Constitutional
By Kenneth D. Christensen
There are political adds running
on the radio here in Illinois that make my blood boil! The ads
attempt to show that Mr. Fitzgerald, a candidate for U.S. Senate
is an extremist. The liberal's main tactic in the last few years
has been to paint anyone that does not agree with them as an extremist.
They back this up by lies, and the press never calls them on it.
If one's only knowledge of the U.S. Constitution was from the
media, what a warped view people would have. Sadly, it seems that
an ever increasing percentage of people believe what liberals
and the press say about the Constitution.
Would you like to know why Mr. Fitzgerald is being labled an
extremist? He is totally opposed to abortion. This means that
he ignores the "constitutional right" to freedom of
reproductive choice. Show me that in the Constitution! This is
a lie, the Constitution never says that a woman has a right to
kill her baby. For the record, I am pro-choice. That means the
woman has every right to not go to bed and get pregnant! That
is where she can say "No"! Once a child has been conceived
there is no more choice. From conception, the new life is a human
being. Mr. Fitzgerald is also called an extremist because he has
said that he would only support Supreme Court nominees that would
be likely to reverse the Roe v. Wade decision.
The liberals would have us believe that a woman has a constitutional
right to kill her unborn baby. One of the major inconsistencies
with the liberal position is, where the baby is killed makes a
difference. For a so called "doctor" to kill the baby
while it is still in the mothers womb is legal. Same baby, same
doctor, same mother: the baby is born and then the doctor kills
it. He will be charged with murder. People that support abortion
agree with that. Another strange inconsistency; if someone shoots
a pregnant woman and kills the baby, they may be charged with
murder, but it is OK if a reprobate with "MD" after
his name accomplishes the same thing. All so called doctors that
murder babies ought to be executed. That is mine and God's opinion.
Hows that for extreme?
These liberals are always saying how they are the ones standing
up for the rights of the people. What about the rights of the
most helpless of human beings, the unborn child. Most of you are
familiar with what God's Word (King James Bible) says about this.
They are still worth reading over again and again to instill in
our minds what God says about the matter. Ponder the teachings
of the following verses:
Psalms 139:13-16 "For thou hast
possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb.
14 I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made:
marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.
15 My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret,
and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth. 16 Thine
eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book
all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned,
when as yet there was none of them." God sees the
unborn, and knows them.
Luke 1:15 "For he shall be great
in the sight of the Lord, and shall drink neither wine nor strong
drink; and he shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his
mother's womb." Do you suppose that God would fill
a non-human with His Spirit?
Luke 1:41 "And it came to pass,
that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped
in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost:"
The unborn child has emotions!
Jeremiah 1:5 "Before I formed thee
in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of
the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto
the nations." Does God ordain non-entities?
Exodus 21:22-23 "If men strive,
and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her,
and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according
as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as
the judges determine. 23 And if any mischief follow, then thou
shalt give life for life," That means if either the
woman or the baby dies, the culprit fries!
Genesis 9:6 "Whoso sheddeth man's
blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God
made he man." Sounds like this could also be a description
Incidently, you must have noticed that the liberals never refer
to the unborn as a baby. They call it a fetus. Calling an unborn
child a baby would make it clear to all but the lowest moron that
they are for killing children. We could not have that! Everything
they do is "for the children". Could someone explain
to me how killing millions of babies is "good for the children"?
Well, one good thing, they will go to Heaven! These murderers
are unwittingly populating Heaven.
Mr. Fitzgerald's opponent is the current outstanding Senator
Carol Mosely-Braun. She got elected six years ago, her platform?
She was outraged that Clarence Thomas, a conservative, was confirmed
by the Senate to the Supreme Court. Miss Mosely-Braun has been
nothing more than an embarrasment to the good people of Illinois.
I will not mention in this space all of the things for which she
has been investigated, if the reader wishes to pursue it, I am
sure that a search on the Internet will provide more than enough
Oh yes, back to the radio ad. I heard the ad on the way to
work this morning. It closes by saying do you really want to elect
a man with such extreme views. I shouted