Is Abortion a Constitutional Right?

By Kenneth D. Christensen

There are political adds running on the radio here in Illinois that make my blood boil! The ads attempt to show that Mr. Fitzgerald, a candidate for U.S. Senate is an extremist. The liberal's main tactic in the last few years has been to paint anyone that does not agree with them as an extremist. They back this up by lies, and the press never calls them on it. If one's only knowledge of the U.S. Constitution was from the media, what a warped view people would have. Sadly, it seems that an ever increasing percentage of people believe what liberals and the press say about the Constitution.

Would you like to know why Mr. Fitzgerald is being labled an extremist? He is totally opposed to abortion. This means that he ignores the "constitutional right" to freedom of reproductive choice. Show me that in the Constitution! This is a lie, the Constitution never says that a woman has a right to kill her baby. For the record, I am pro-choice. That means the woman has every right to not go to bed and get pregnant! That is where she can say "No"! Once a child has been conceived there is no more choice. From conception, the new life is a human being. Mr. Fitzgerald is also called an extremist because he has said that he would only support Supreme Court nominees that would be likely to reverse the Roe v. Wade decision.

The liberals would have us believe that a woman has a constitutional right to kill her unborn baby. One of the major inconsistencies with the liberal position is, where the baby is killed makes a difference. For a so called "doctor" to kill the baby while it is still in the mothers womb is legal. Same baby, same doctor, same mother: the baby is born and then the doctor kills it. He will be charged with murder. People that support abortion agree with that. Another strange inconsistency; if someone shoots a pregnant woman and kills the baby, they may be charged with murder, but it is OK if a reprobate with "MD" after his name accomplishes the same thing. All so called doctors that murder babies ought to be executed. That is mine and God's opinion. Hows that for extreme?

These liberals are always saying how they are the ones standing up for the rights of the people. What about the rights of the most helpless of human beings, the unborn child. Most of you are familiar with what God's Word (King James Bible) says about this. They are still worth reading over again and again to instill in our minds what God says about the matter. Ponder the teachings of the following verses:

Psalms 139:13-16 "For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb. 14 I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well. 15 My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth. 16 Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them." God sees the unborn, and knows them.

Luke 1:15 "For he shall be great in the sight of the Lord, and shall drink neither wine nor strong drink; and he shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mother's womb." Do you suppose that God would fill a non-human with His Spirit?

Luke 1:41 "And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost:" The unborn child has emotions!

Jeremiah 1:5 "Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." Does God ordain non-entities?

Exodus 21:22-23 "If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. 23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life," That means if either the woman or the baby dies, the culprit fries!

Genesis 9:6 "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man." Sounds like this could also be a description of abortion!

Incidently, you must have noticed that the liberals never refer to the unborn as a baby. They call it a fetus. Calling an unborn child a baby would make it clear to all but the lowest moron that they are for killing children. We could not have that! Everything they do is "for the children". Could someone explain to me how killing millions of babies is "good for the children"? Well, one good thing, they will go to Heaven! These murderers are unwittingly populating Heaven.

Mr. Fitzgerald's opponent is the current outstanding Senator Carol Mosely-Braun. She got elected six years ago, her platform? She was outraged that Clarence Thomas, a conservative, was confirmed by the Senate to the Supreme Court. Miss Mosely-Braun has been nothing more than an embarrasment to the good people of Illinois. I will not mention in this space all of the things for which she has been investigated, if the reader wishes to pursue it, I am sure that a search on the Internet will provide more than enough material.

Oh yes, back to the radio ad. I heard the ad on the way to work this morning. It closes by saying do you really want to elect a man with such extreme views. I shouted


Home Page
Soap Box